SpaceX's starship program is a very, very big thing for the company. It is still in its infancy, with test flights not yet reaching Earth's orbit, but in the future, we may see stars moving humans to Mars or even further. With all of this in mind, you can understand why each launch of SpaceX is important to both SpaceX and, potentially, humanity, but with a trio of explosions marrying the previous three launches, it is a must for the company. It was time to try.

We now know why Starship SN10 detonated after landing || Spacex Internet Service Plans
We now know why Starship SN10 detonated after landing


Now, with the image of the starship SN10 exploding on the landing pad still fresh in everyone's mind, SpaceX boss Elon Musk has finally offered some details that could explain why the powerful rocket was a one-launch surprise.
According to Musk, some of the issues already working for the possibility of the next prototype contributed to the SN10's landing issues. To be clear, the spacecraft did "land", but did so by not being too fat to handle its landing legs. The prototype apparently crushed its legs when it landed, and Musk thinks he knows why.

“The SN10 engine was low on thrust (probably) due to partial helium ingestion from the fuel header tank. Musk impressed on the legs and skirts of 10 m / s. He then explained why there was an issue that began with helium ingestion: "If self-generated pressure was used, CH4 bubbles would return to the most liquid. Use of helium in the helium to prevent it from rupturing the bowel Was done in a prior flight. It's my fault for approval. It looked good at the time. "

The former flying Musk was referencing here was the SN8, which also ended in an explosion. In an attempt to solve a problem, SpaceX may have inadvertently created another one. But now it's all in the past, and SpaceX is quick to prove that it can land its starship in minutes without a single explosion.

Musk noted in follow-up tweets that SpaceX is not fully set on using legs for future starships. It is possible, Musk said, that the company would opt for "catch" technology instead of controlled landing. That wouldn't be great, but as Musk believes, it would probably be a more reliable option.

"It may be that the ship is caught with a launch tower, similar to a booster," Musk explained. "Just that it can land on a big trap or bouncy castle. Reduces dignity, but will work. But, customized landing propellant is only ~ 5% dry mass, so it's not a gamechanger."

SpaceX is no stranger to failure. The company routinely celebrated its failures with the Falcon 9, long before its launch and safe landing were normalized. We have no hope from the stewardship program, but time will tell.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post